ÍX . a commentary on Bharata's Nātyaśāstra and and the work is not mentioned elsewhere. On asri) Udbhafa, Lollafa Sankuka, Ghantaka, rañgarāja have commented. Abhinavagupta's rred to as Bhāsyavyākhyāla by Achyutarāya In the tālū Section.' Kumbhakarna (1450 A.D.) entaries, and Jāyana (1240 A.D.) was well ya, Bālab0dhamô also is not available to us, by Gajapati Nārāyana (probably of 1700 A.D.) Sangitaširomani are found in the Libraries of ta, and of H. H. the Maharajah of Bikanir. jpy extends over the gita section alone. The of a different work on tala and has no connec पण्डितमण्डलीवैिविते मङ्गीतशिरोमणैौ तानप्रकाशः ॥ 3 Maharājah of Bikanir extends over sections tīrņa miscellaneous. Someśvara and his son hey are the great authorities on prabandha t would surely form a noble addition to the Citraktsa next deserves our notice. He wrote Udavyākhyā and Chandi grammar a few years e various Mahammadan Sultans in Hindustan. four sections each, and four chapters to each anthas where the first two books form about als that he very closely followed Šārāgadeva a, Wipradẫsa, Aśoka, Devendra, Madana and usly copies from Vipradāsa and in Prabhanters into Śăstric discussions sowell mastered ia are mentioned by his son and daughter in se that a king called Kălasena, son of Tămad Gitagovindatika as well. The body of the he name of Kumbhakarna and his numerous na and his more numerous titles which are n the long and short Colophons, For instance Brahmādri, both of which were turned into says on the śtoka - यं च तस्यैव केचिकार्षेि प्रचक्षते । । क्षर्ण भट्टलोल्लटशङ्ककयभूषोन मतम्य भिन्नत्येनहुः । X number of Hindu and Mahammadan kings. ns, was an author of Dramas in Telugu, Kanavocal and instrumental). His wife was a fine was Jaksmåmbikä. The places that Kumbha rovinces; Kālasena's are in Mahratta Country, :omplete mention of Kālasena and his discovery given as 1506 A. D. This assigns to him the luthorship was mentioned in 1480 in two inscrip. gitarāja ascribed to his name fifty years after sted that ancestors, or some Scholar in his night have composed the work and the dedig much benefit was ascribed once more to fact remains to the infamy of Kālasena that is rumoured, was the real author, but one wrote a work on Ŝilpit under Kumbha's patrome. Such stories are current with every case y not be false. For Our purpose Kumbha's Claim of Kālasena is a fitting case for decision in Andhra Country, was the author of Sangita |. He belonged to the royal family of the Reddis ajahmundry. Vema was a great scholar and tāmani, a good book on poetics and commenHāla. Great poets like Srinatha and Vāmana. Nrtta sections alone in Sahgitaeintãmani are has. It is regrettable that the Gita section is bn is couched in easy and elegant diction. va, probably lived about 1500. lle mentions f Trilocana) and Natyadarpana (different from , ćio a is thought to be a part of SañgitasarvaJatidasa and mentions the king Udayavatsa based on Ratnākara and portions are poetic addhara commented on Mālatīmādhava and ‘ājiya of about 1390A. D. modara, lived later than Jagaddhara and wrote Ittached by Ghanašyāma of Nepal. Sangitadātopics on Saigita Dramaturgy in poetics. In in India, east and west. Subhaskara gives ensive and correct knowledge of the Subjects Abhinawa and Trilocana), two Nātyadarpanas agi, Ŝarada (of Śāradātanaya) Sangitachūdā1 Nataka, Nāgarasarvasva (of Padmašri) and a Karnātic king of Nepal).
पृष्ठम्:भरतकोशः-१.pdf/14
एतत् पृष्ठम् अपरिष्कृतम् अस्ति
