पृष्ठम्:भरतकोशः-१.pdf/9

{ r Yāstika. He gives fifty-three Deši Rāgas tna etc. He enlarges chapters on Rûpa and pied by Mokshadeva here and there. Hammira by Talas and in Vinas Ekatañāri, Nakulá, He describes Drstis well and then he devotes a chapter on the drāma. e is the author of zazīrāagan The work ng with the construction of literary works. He is a powerful writer with a correct a Minister or Treasurer to king Bhima of Bhāskarāchārya’s Lilāvati. He belonged to hree topics Gita, Vädya and Nytta. Ratnāting Gråma Rāgas he gives out about fifty § to have flourished about 1320 A.D. ruled over it in 1375 A. D. He was a Telugu S on Dharmaśāstra, Nighahtu and Music. vara who ascribed all his works to king Madana. ondasañjivini is quoted by Kumbhakarma in figitaširomani. The work is in the form of Tālādhyāya where he mentions about one Prastára. The second chapter deals with hapter deals with Prabandhas which suddenly n 1529 and consists of no errors. The work Iङ्को द्रलघुर्मतः । ‘ed and thirty Tālas are given. Then comes विंशतिस्तस्मात् श्रुतयो नाम यास्त्विमाः ।। " In a conservative manner. | इति डु(ह ?)म्बीरलक्षणन । | ने पनस ॥ इति । । | ममरेि सासा रीगा इति । è dedicated his works in 1380 (Vikramaśaka, terature. He belonged to Harsa Puri branch. He deals with Dharmas and Mantha Tālas. He Tālas including · Prthvikunɖala. The whole ads:— वार्य श्रीसुधाकलशविरचिते स्वोपज्ञसङ्गीतोपनिषत्सारोद्भरेि which only Nrttaprakāśa is available. He . Satyavák, Sivavallabha, Vicitravak, Karaikara, Singana, Mādhava and several older He writes in precise terse style and deeply Cmmented upon in Nepali language by king ). Vipradāsa says:-- वि यमसृज्यत नाट्यवेदम् । विशेषमथ तण्डुगिरीन्द्रजाभ्याम् । न्यधान्निजसुतेषु तथाप्सरस्सु । धूं विदग्धजनराजकुमारिकाद्याः । Fयते ह्यभिलाषेण विद्वचरणसेविना ।। " Sloka is given;– हु दोषविवर्जितं स्यात् । र्मितिरसवेितेि चेन्न देीष: ।। " tuktúvali, lived probably in the second half ith Nrita even of late type. His verses on tamuktāvali. Traces of medieval development appear in a more improved form in Devenore catalogues have adduced the identity of the latter is in Śarada script which was not the works of both the authors. ntioned by Panditamandali in 1429 A. D. and Rudrāchārya and probably lived in Gopāchala Nrtta and even in it to that of later type.