संस्कृतपरीक्षा नाम सप्तम प्रकरणम् ८७ निर्विरोधमुपलभामहे, यत उत्पन्न नैव उत्पद्यते नवा अनुत्पन्नमुत्- पद्यते, उत्पद्यमानमपि नोत्पद्यते इति तस्माद् उत्पत्तिक्रियैव नास्तीत्यायातम् ॥१५॥ ostate-f75at1 cutat graco 97052 CT TS911 998 7789271 syfofo tegonta gfagi fage als 2150 216, 2179 Teatre a777 976 fg7! 67165 170 175 testfe font prata
- f55 19 19 675 7 ca wasta tegiyata afga qa50 €17,
कान बलौडामशान बागानन मिक्काल । 599 tsatſer ate at 7151 Teata 967 utste tegunta $81791 ICT 97671 fapsathia o afo piata gajè of ay peate I Teatforgate 91581 TS91 91 aftag tay at UA15917 fratatata Teguata 991 atero 9173, fate f Pagtag afsata fps #813 Estrela Stegt tegala 73 1848 71, utgt afato facgo tefc7 ate a1.qata 99 51791 667 71, 7139 99 afaca cearen 9643 facgd 7017]ffa pfIO F1 079699 teafare stat sa faca terbarthica arasu gelu atc3 all your quxq977 f7618 4. F#74 #fI81 795 FÈCT? Tsagata afaut fag fakta #31 789 at Beata Pao: teafo faatas apie garfo Fail 097 garnia 1613 6467 TSJ 168 || Sell
- -
English Translation :- The opponent may argue here that the supposition that there is no scope of third (thing to be born) outside the two, namely born, and unborn (utpanna and anutpanna), is not tenable, for one must admit the existence of a verb in the form of origination (utpatti), The object which will be connected with this act of origina- tion will at that state be counted as being born ( utpadya- mana) for we accept the theory of Pratityasamutpada. The verse is placed here to oppose this contention of the opponent. The opponent argues that an object depending on the act of origination may be called would-be-born (ut-
