संस्कृतपरोक्षानाम सप्तमं प्रकरणम् de
- ae utat as ito stes all custofatra kata yetopal youte
07787519 p.17 otatte te afe tu 9103 ani 939999 tetto थलाक मानि श्वना ॥२०॥ English Translation :—This verse is inserted here speci- fically to stress that origin of objects in reality does not exist. This has been elaborated in the sixth verse of the first chapter. A passing reference is made here. Objects are classed under two heads-existing (Sat) and non-existing (Asat). If one is to regard object as Sat, then it must be such (Sat) even before its origin, for an existing object always remains as such and can never be Asat (non-existing). So if an object is Sat before its existence, then it is futile to conceive its origin, for re-origin of existing objects like pot etc. is never noticed. Thus it is reasonable that an ever-existing (Sat) object has no origin (Utpatti). If we regard the object as non-existing (Asat) its origin cannot take place in any way, for as per our previous argument a non-existing object will remain non-existing for all time to come and cannot be Sat. The son of a son- less woman is its example. So the origin of an object of non-existing nature cannot take place. So origin of objects in reality cannot be proved. ॥20॥ कि चान्यत्। इहायमुत्पादः परिकल्प्यमानो निरुध्यमानसानि. त्यतानुगतस्य वर्तमानस्य वा भावस्य परिकल्पाते, अनिरुध्यमानस्य वा प्रतीतानागतस्यानित्यताविरहितस्य । उभयथा च नोपपद्यते इत्याह- - निरुध्यमानस्योत्पत्तिर्न मावस्योपपद्यते। यश्चानिरुध्यमानस्तु स भावो नोपपद्यते ॥२१॥ तत्र निरुध्यमानस्य वत्तमानस्य विद्यमानत्वादुत्पादो नोपपद्यते । अनिरुध्यमानस्यापि विनाधरहितस्यातीतानागतस्य भावलचा
