संस्कृतपरीक्षानाम सप्तमं प्रकरणम् ११८ वख विनष्ठे रशे नास्त । पय अवछ। साना सिनष्ठे न देश वना यान ना।
- 179 tu vazta ao 9819517 neatst Arflo FIAT 7731731
face scale fez TET FII gote atants HET fug pooja 7767 216 faare 909 feo faa1*177 stay atfect fateh 7% faale cu 1 all type 47 px patari faatan feodat optealço onda faatas pauetati guat sea a1 +18 74721 Tega ECT CFTATU? 1099 1979 fatale 1913 मलव न८२ । ॥२॥ English Translation-Destruction is of the nature of two kinds. In certain cases after destruction no new object is produced as in the case of destruction of a jar. In other cases through the destruction of one object, other conditions arise, as through the destruction the condition of milk the curd ( Dadhi ) is produced. Discussion has been made about the first type of vinasa (destruction) and now it is with reference to the second type. The quession is : whether certain condition destroys itself or it is destroyed by others. It is not reasonable to suppose that one destroys oneself for if destruction has no other cause, then an object may be destroyed at the time of origin. Nor can it be stated that object is destroyed by others for the condition ( Anya avastha ) can have no contact with the previous condition (purvavastha ). Curd can only develop when the milky condition is gone. So it is not possible on the part of milky condition to have contact with the curdy condition. But it is a fact that the object to be destroyed must have contact with the destroyer for destruction. Moreover along with the destruction of the milky condition, milk will also have to be destroyed. So if the asraya ( milk ) is destroyed, where will curdy condition be developed ? So destruction cannot be accepted at any cost. ॥ 28 ॥ यदैव सर्वधर्माणामुत्पादो नोपपद्यते । इत्युक्ताम् ।
