१२ मूलमध्यमककारिका 121 157 pala atats 07049 5 2746 atste 7703 antes al afaca cal q$ appare *64 pfaat Gy othTÁJ atsitaa arqatiga CT, Cas Trong atatas go atosto pel753464 Beco stes als coats afgerata) 77777 plaat gestae e fagipo $691 0721434-31st gatet har ett fagotta 2018 7471 NIC® 11, 8 th gata fasta #f441 cmfits at | HÍT ATIC® ® gaat afgan tetapil a 5171 PECA TE LT7*1100 e atst ontos for atu osat 1911 PEIGO 7591 09 Beta tetrau gister 79997 pfaat ( 19taftala atste 799 va faat) $sqa preto 17618 #falo BÈTE I for 1716 1717 946987 Feata 498 70*79 131 at 1777, 45 TETAatfe 789 T0 9769 Ali Fuat atste auto' opefte atsip 79991 afganga 1498 4, Bei 771 to all faqat 17.67, 1974##04 atst afayata atce uten eta gerta ofseta 1415 Feath ofta netzat etap afy,
- 1741 atst opfagata pêta 5taatfra yo cz1 wale peata tota
opta steg atfero 9103 al 071 ofagata atst ja 917 पक्रिन कबना कन्ना पामराव । 7549 951 65ta 69 atst, stoi 1707 picae utata 1 o PN1 11 1998 967907 BETTO tay पाना बकमिकि कना यान ना ॥२॥ Explanatory Translation :-Examination of the question of Raga has been made in the previous verse. The oppon- ent may say that Raga has been proved as non-existent no doubt, but the case of Rakta still stands. Rakta is what is Asraya of Raga. So through the existence of Rakta one may infer to existence of Raga. On it Nagarjuna argues that the argument through which the existence of Raga has been disproved may be applied in this case also to disprove the existence of Rakta. This is as follows: We must discuss whether Raga exists before Rakta or not. If we admit the first course then we are to admit that Raga may exist in a condition where there is no Rakta. In that case we may conclude that Rakta grows by depending on (Rakta-less) Raga. But the moment of Raga (Raga ksana ) precedes
