पृष्ठम्:वेदान्तसारः.djvu/१४७

पुटमेतत् सुपुष्टितम्

प्रथमाध्याये तृतीथः पादः १०५

शुश्रूषोःक्षत्रियत्वावगतेश्च न जातियोगेन शूद्रेत्यामन्त्रणम् ॥    उपक्रमे    'बहुद्वायी'  इत्यादिना  दानपतित्वबहुपक्वान्नदायित्वबहुग्रामप्रदानैरस्य हि 'क्षत्रियत्वं गम्यते ॥               
          उत्तरत्र चैत्ररथेन लिङ्कात् ॥ ३५ ॥  
 उपरिष्टाच्चास्यां संवर्गविद्यायां  ब्राह्मणक्षत्रेिययोरेवान्वयो  दृश्यते-अथ ह शौनकं च कापेयमभिप्रतारिणं च' इत्यादौ । अभिप्रतारी हि चैत्ररथः क्षत्रियः । अभिप्रतारिणश्चैत्ररथत्वं क्षत्रियत्वं च कापेयसाहचर्या-

Because the disciple was recognized to be a Ksatriya, he was not addressed as a member of the Shudra community. In the beginning of the scriptural text, it is stated that he was the donor of many valuable things. Thus it becomes clear that he was a Ksatriya ; because he made gift of many things, plentiful cooked rice and many villages. . 35. Uttaratra caitrarathena lingat And on account of the inferential sign (occurring in the subsequent passage), namely, 'along with Caitraratha ' . Regarding this Samvargavidya in a later passage it is seen that this Vidya should be resorted to by Brahmans and Ksatriyas only. The scriptural text is this. 'Then Saunaka Kapeya and AbhiPratarin etc.' (Chdnd. IV- 3-5). Now AbhiPratarin is Caitraratha and a Ksatriya. That AbhiPratarin was Caitraratha and also a Ksatriya is made known by that word being placed in juxtaposition with Kapeya. In a different context, the characteritics 1 हि omitted AI,M3. संवर्ग omitted M 3.