विकिस्रोतःसम्भाषणम्:प्रबन्धकाः

'प्रबन्धिका'पदनिमित्तम् आवेदनम्

अहं शुभा, आ चतुर्भ्यः वर्षेभ्यः विकिकार्ये निरता अस्मि । संस्कृतविकिस्रोतसः संवर्धनदृष्ट्या अहं प्रबन्धिकारूपेण कार्यं निर्वोढुम् इच्छामि ।

मम योगदानम् अधः द्रष्टुम् अर्हन्ति - शुभा

भवताम् अभिप्रायम् अधः सूचयन्तु इति प्रार्थये । --शुभा (सम्भाषणम्) ०७:३८, १४ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)

चर्चा

@yogesh you need to understand what you are opposing and where should write under what tag. You should move your comments from oppose to discussion and paste it without oppose tag since you are not opposing the candidate. You are opposing Vipin kumar as a voter and you say that his vote should not be counted. He has already removed his name from the list and Puranastudy is a valid account. --Sayant Mahato (सम्भाषणम्) १०:१९, १८ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)

@Sayant Mahato First of All I want to tell you my name is Yograj. I can see your oppose is very political. You want to prove front of bureaucrats that, if I and @Shubha have oppose, than @Udit also has oppose. That's it. For this reason this voting is going to different side. But I know the root problem behind all this. Therefore I am again clarify that I didn't oppose any person. My point was please don't count Vipin Kumar's vote. Because I had seen in history he had made two supports. 1 Vipin kumar 2. puranstudy. for you and Shubha. If you doing this for bureaucrats, please stop this. I didn't support you but I want you three be admins. Please understand. By the way I had learnt this kind of discussion system from you only. Please see it and end up this opposing game. Please don't tell me that there was not a "चर्चा" section, so I didn't do and etc..... Yograj (सम्भाषणम्) १७:२९, १८ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)

Hey! @Yograj you are attacking me personally. I think you should rebuttal me with logic rather making weird allegation. I don't have any problem to accept if I'm wrong. And didn't oppose Udit personally. It maybe seen as political or conspiracy in your eyes but in fact there is none. --Sayant Mahato (सम्भाषणम्) ०४:४३, १९ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)

यः निर्णयः भवति सः मया अनुमन्यते । --शुभा (सम्भाषणम्) ०५:०५, २३ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)

समर्थनम्

1. समर्थनम्--Sayant Mahato (सम्भाषणम्) ०६:१४, १६ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)
2. समर्थनम्--Vaishnavi (सम्भाषणम्) ०६:५७, १६ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)
3. समर्थनम्--Puranastudy (सम्भाषणम्) १६ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)
4. समर्थनम्----Narayanan V T (सम्भाषणम्) १०:२१, १६ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)
5. समर्थनम्--Mahalakshmi Prasanna (सम्भाषणम्) ०६:५५, १८ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)
6. समर्थनम्--अनुनाद सिंह (सम्भाषणम्) १०:०४, २ फरवरी २०१६ (UTC)

विरोधः

1. विरोधं -- This Vipin Kumar is not a user of any wiki project. I think that is fake support. Please don't count it. Yograj (सम्भाषणम्) ०९:५०, १६ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)

https://sa.wikisource.org/w/index.php?title=Wikisource%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%AE%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AD%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B7%E0%A4%A3%E0%A4%AE%E0%A5%8D%3A%E0%A4%AA%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B0%E0%A4%B6%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%A8%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%A7%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%95%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B0%E0%A5%80&type=revision&diff=44900&oldid=44896

1. विरोधं -- @Sayant Mahato I have studied Shubha’s contribution. She had changed so many articles with help of HotCat. If I am not using or don’t know HotCat and tell someone that Shubha’s contributions cannot be considered as formal editing. Than someone who uses HotCat very obviously, he will laugh on my logic and intelligence. If AWB edits are not formal editing, than WHY Wikimedia counting that as edits. ? Ex.
2. https://sa.wikisource.org/wiki/सुभाषितानि_संस्कृते
3. https://sa.wikisource.org/wiki/सुभाषितावलिः
4. https://sa.wikisource.org/wiki/हेमन्तव्रज्या_(सुभाषितरत्नकोशः)

Here she putted category with help of HotCat. There are two other ways to do this work. First is go to edit mode and write [[वर्गः:सुभाषितानि]]. Second is make a list of those pages which should in same category. Run AWB and finish work. Now which is very intelligent? But you only want to bite new comers. You took my comment at different side. My point was 'Udit will use his admin rights and will do creative work. Because he is a person who believe in use of right in proper time.' You took meaning which you wanted from my sentences. And when from your sentences @Yograj took some proper meaning, you are telling that he gets "Personally"? Wow! When you are taking different meaning, than it is "FACT" and for others it is "Personal Attack"? Yograj had told you that he took dissection pattern from you. Why you didn’t respond him for that? Now I understood that you both (Sayant & Shubha) are doing . So I am opposing you both to stop this new comers attack. प्रतिमा (सम्भाषणम्) ०२:३६, २० जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)

1. I am a new comer and done some mistake. But I follow @Sayant Mahato to discussion and he himself putting me wrong. I told him "Good Editor (Person)", because I didn’t want to oppose anyone. Now scenario is different. He is attacking new editors to get right. It seems, Sayant let not be admin others. Sayant and Shubha had much supports to be an admin. But they tried to stop Udit to be an admin. This is very clear seen. Sayant is directly involve in this and Shubha is indirectly. Both are stopping others without any reason or one reason "Only we are do something, others can’t do anything." So I oppose both them to stop सञ्चिका:Pdnbtn.png Yograj (सम्भाषणम्) ०५:०२, २० जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)
2. When @Yograj oppose by mistake, @Titodutta asked him reason. After his clarification @sayant should have told yograj to remove that oppose sing and please put into decision section. I have seen Yograj’s clarification and understood the root reason of oppose. We should show the strength of new comers, if someone uses his experience against new comers. I am also opposing both for this. I am adding more that, @Udit Sharma is more capable, than @Shubha. If Udit is not eligible to be an admin, than according to capability of work speed @Shubha is not too. Sshihora (सम्भाषणम्) ०५:१४, २० जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)

Surely I'll not talk nonsense with anyone. But let me put points or whatever it is in a right prospective. The points which have raised are-

Your reason of opposing are-

1. Opposing the newcomers.
2. Opposing candidature-ship.
3. AWB or HotCat issue.

1. This is childish to say we are restricting newcomers to be an admin. they are well in the rights with being an editor. we are here to propagate not to defame our wikiprojects. But certainly we can't let anybody who is unqualified to be an admin. One has to understand that it's different from wikipedia. Sshihora claim that Udit would a better admin than shubha. I advice him to practice jyotisha somewhere else but the reality is that the person (Udit) doesn't carry any credibility to be an admin. If you think 'yes' then give point by point answers which were raised opposing Udit's candidature.

2 why you are opposing her and mine candidature. This totally out of the issue and doing opposing just for the sake of oppose. Do you have any reference that we have attacked anybody or restricted them from editing.

3.I have never said that editing by using AWB or any script is/will not count as his contribution. But it's not worthy when you have contribute only for Three Days. Then come and say I Wanna be An Admin. "why are you opposing?" Being a good editor pratima shows a smarter way of editing by using AWB. Where as there are many by using py script. Agreed. That doesn't destabilized shubha Ji's candidature because she has created so many new pages.--Sayant Mahato (सम्भाषणम्) ०६:३७, २० जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)

ताटस्थ्यम्

शुभामहोदयायाः प्रथमाङ्कनम् अस्ति अतः अत्र लिखामि, परन्तु त्रिषु सदस्येषु ताटस्थ्यं ज्ञेयम् ।

@Shubha @Sayant Mahato @Puranastudy @Yograj @Vaishnavi @Narayanan V T @Mahalakshmi Prasanna @प्रतिमा @Sshihora @Udit Sharma @NehalDaveND @N.R.Bahlika Rao @Titodutta सर्वेभ्यः नमांसि.... अखिलं पृष्ठमेतत् अधुना विरोधसमर्थनैः परिपूर्णम् अस्ति । एतस्यां स्थितौ न कस्यापि प्रबन्धकत्वेन स्वीकृतिं पश्याम्यहम् । विरोधस्य कारणानि कुत्रचित् उचितानि सन्ति, कुत्रचित् अनुचितानि । परन्तु एवं तु न कोऽपि प्रबन्धकः भविष्यतीति निश्चितम् । दोषारोपणारोपणयोः यानि मूलकारणानि आसन्, तानि न पश्याम्यहम् । उदितमहोदयस्य विषये सायन्तमहोदयेन यदुक्तम् आसीत्, तत् अधुना सत्यं न पश्यामि । परन्तु तस्मिन् समये तस्य वचनस्य अयोग्यत्वमपि नासीत् । यतः उदितस्य ओफलैन् कार्यविषये कोऽपि न जानाति स्म । अधुना तु तस्य कार्यं प्रत्यक्षम् अस्ति ।

विभिन्नैः योजकैः नूतनसदस्यभक्षणारोपः कृतः । परन्तु यदि सायन्तादयः उदितस्य विरोधं तस्य कार्यं दृष्ट्वा स्थगयन्ति, तर्हि नूतनसदस्यभक्षणस्य आरोपः मिथ्या सिद्ध्यति । ततः अन्यैः सदस्यैः स्वारोपः अपि प्रतिकर्षणीयो भविष्यत्येव । एवं सर्वेषु समर्थनानि एव भविष्यन्ति । त्रयः अपि सदस्याः प्रबन्धकदायित्वं प्राप्स्यन्ति । अहमत्र कल्पितवान् तथैव पृष्ठं भवेत् । क्षमा वीरस्य भूषणम् RAMKRISHNA RAVAL (सम्भाषणम्) १५:२०, २२ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)

सदस्यः:Shubha -महोदयया तु योग्यः निर्णयः स्वीकृतः । अधुना सदस्यः:Sayant Mahato सदस्यः:Yograj सदस्यः:Narayanan V T सदस्यः:प्रतिमा सदस्यः:Sshihora सदस्यः:N.R.Bahlika Rao इत्यादिभ्यः अवसरः अस्ति । कृपया स्वस्य सम्पादनं चर्चाविभागे संस्थाप्य विरोधचिह्नम् अपाकुर्वन्तु । अहं तु एतादृशेभ्यः कार्येभ्यः योग्यः नास्मि । अतः सदस्यः:Sayant Mahato निवेदयामि यत्, भवान् चर्चापृष्ठे स्थापनस्य आरम्भं कृत्वा अन्यान् प्रेरयतु । सर्वेभ्यः हितम् अस्ति । जयतु संस्कृतम् । RAMKRISHNA RAVAL (सम्भाषणम्) ०५:४६, २३ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)

’यः निर्णयः भवति सः मया अनुमन्यते’ इत्यस्मिन् वाक्ये मम अभिप्रायः सदस्यैः विषयाणां स्थानपरिवर्तनविषये न अपि तु अन्तिमनिर्णयस्य विषये । -शुभा (सम्भाषणम्) ०७:१०, २४ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)

प्राबन्धकावेदनम्

सायन्त माहातो नामधेयोऽहं विकिप्रकल्पेषु कार्यनिरतोऽस्मि । विकिस्रोतसि प्रबन्धकत्त्वम् प्राप्त्यर्थम् अहमिदम् आवेदनं कुर्वन्नस्मि ।

• मम योगदानम्-

https://sa.wikisource.org/wiki/विशेषः:योगदानम्/Sayant_Mahato

स्वाभिप्रायान् भवन्तः सूचयन्तु --Sayant Mahato (सम्भाषणम्) ०७:५५, १४ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)

चर्चा

You should move your comments from oppose to discussion and paste it without oppose tag since you are not opposing me as a candidate as per your comment. You are opposing Vipin kumar as a voter and you say that his vote should not be counted. He has already removed his name from the list and Puranastudy is a valid account. --Sayant Mahato (सम्भाषणम्) १०:२३, १८ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)

समर्थनम्

1. समर्थनम्--शुभा (सम्भाषणम्) ०५:५९, १६ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)
2. समर्थनम्--Puranastudy (सम्भाषणम्) १६ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)
3. समर्थनम्--Narayanan V T (सम्भाषणम्) १०:२५, १६ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)
4. समर्थनम्--Mahalakshmi Prasanna (सम्भाषणम्) ०६:५६, १८ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)
5. समर्थनम्--अनुनाद सिंह (सम्भाषणम्) १०:०५, २ फरवरी २०१६ (UTC)

विरोधः

1. विरोधं -- This Vipin Kumar is not a user of any wiki project. I think that is fake support. Please don't count it. Yograj (सम्भाषणम्) ०९:५०, १६ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC) https://sa.wikisource.org/w/index.php?title=Wikisource%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%AE%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AD%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B7%E0%A4%A3%E0%A4%AE%E0%A5%8D%3A%E0%A4%AA%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B0%E0%A4%B6%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%A8%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%A7%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%95%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B0%E0%A5%80&type=revision&diff=44900&oldid=44896

   सदस्यः:Yograj, I failed to understand what you meant here. Are you talking against the candidate (i.e. Sayant Mahato) or any voter? If you are talking against any voter, that is not a reason to oppose this nomination unless you clarify more. About the vote - should it be counted or not -- the closing admin will surely take it into consideration. Thanks. --Tito Dutta ✉ १३:०५, १६ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)

I am not apposing any one Sayant is good editor. In URL you can see puranstudy make a wrong vote. I requested that Please don't count that vote. Now that vote is not there but you can see that mistake in url. Yograj (सम्भाषणम्) १३:३८, १६ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)

1. विरोधं -- प्रतिमा (सम्भाषणम्) ०२:३८, २० जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)
2. विरोधं -- Yograj (सम्भाषणम्) ०५:१२, २० जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)
3. विरोधं -- Sshihora (सम्भाषणम्) ०५:१४, २० जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)

प्रबन्धकाधिकाराय आवेदनम्

मम नाम उदितः शर्मा । अहं वर्षद्वयेभ्यः संस्कृतविकिपीडियाजाले सक्रियः सदस्यः अस्मि । विकिस्रोतसि प्रबन्धककार्यं कर्तुं मे सज्जता । अतः अत्र प्रबन्धकाधिकाराय निवेदयामि ।

• मम योगदानम् Udit Sharma (सम्भाषणम्) ०६:५४, १६ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)

स्वविचारान् उपस्थापयन्तु ।

चर्चा

शुभामहोदयायाः अनुसरणं कुर्वन् अहमपि सर्वेषां निर्णयम् अङ्गीकर्तुं प्रस्तुतः । Udit Sharma (सम्भाषणम्) ०९:५३, २३ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)

समर्थनम्

1. समर्थनम् -- In sa.wikipedia Udit's work is very impressive. He had helped me for this issue for improve sa.wikisource. From last several days there are so much vandalism in sa.wikisource and sa.wikipedia. Udit had managed those people and put unwanted articles in delete category. In sa.wikipedia he is the most active person to manage such things. Now he is doing that kind of work here too. He is the most capable person to get this right. NehalDaveND (सम्भाषणम्) ०८:०९, १६ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)
2. समर्थनम् -- उदितमहोदयः स्वाधिकारस्य उपयोगः कथं कर्तव्यः इति सम्यक् जानाति । संस्कृतविकिपीडिया-जाले सर्वे अधिकारान् स्थापयितुं तु इच्छान्ति, परन्तु कार्यं तु विरलाः एव कुर्वन्ति । परन्तु निरीक्षकः उदितमहोदयः तत्र स्वदायित्वं योग्यरीत्या अवहत् । अत्रापि एनम् अधिकारं प्राप्य सः तेषाम् अधिकारणां योग्यम् उपयोगं करिष्यति । प्रबन्धकः केवलम् अधिकारः नास्ति, अपि तु तदानुगुणं कार्यम् अपि करणीयं भवति । एतस्य विचारस्य कृते दृढसङ्कल्पी उदितमहोदयः एतस्मै अधिकाराय योग्यतमः । प्रतिमा (सम्भाषणम्) ०८:२२, १६ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)
3. समर्थनम् -- Udit Sharma is the most active person is sa.wikipedia, sa.wikisource, WikiMedia, Commence and wikidata. ALL ROUNDER Udit doing good job himself and inspires others too. Yograj (सम्भाषणम्) ०९:५६, १६ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)
4. समर्थनम् -- Puranastudy (सम्भाषणम्) १६ जनवरी २०१६
5. समर्थनम् -- Some times politically we can't prove our hard work, but we must be strong to prove our moral hard work via political stage. The Steve jobs had done lots of hard work for apple. But he couldn't prove that and he had been thrown out from company by other members. After some time he proved his hard work politically too. But that time also his moral hard work bigger than politically proves. I suggest you @Udit Sharma don't loos hope. Your work is intelligent and proper. I am fully agree with @yogrraj. So I don't want to oppose @Sayant Mahato and @Shubha. Because if Sayant is doing this for bureaucrats, than he will understand and be fare for Udit after Yougraj's clarification. Sshihora (सम्भाषणम्) ०३:३९, १९ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)
6. समर्थनम्--अनुनाद सिंह (सम्भाषणम्) १०:०६, २ फरवरी २०१६ (UTC)

विरोधः

विरोधं I strongly oppose Udit Sharma's candidature for adminship.
Eligibility:
He has never added a text on wikisource or at the least not even created an index page. The sub pages which has been created by him are just text splitting of Laghu siddhanta kaumudi.
Experience:
He has worked only for three days 12th 13th and 16th of January 2016. 2 days by using AWB which cannot be considered as formal editing. Though his first edit was year before on 30th January 2015, he has not made any significant contribution to wikisource till date.
Efficiency :
I don't think Udit has ever shown efficiency or knowledge on wikisource. He cannot propose for adminship based on his contributions on wikipedia. Wikipedia project is completely different from wikisource. He may be good at helping others on translation work but this is totally irrelevant in wikisource. Pratima accuse others saying that many people apply for adminship for the sake of rights but in reality they won't work and says Udit being an admin would do a lot of work. But without doing any work on wikisource how can one be assumed as a reformer of wikisource ? Therefore I suggest Udit Sharma to do a considerable constructive work on Wikisource before applying for adminship.--Sayant Mahato (सम्भाषणम्) १२:२८, १८ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)

विरोधं - I am deeply anguished to note that the discussions have turned into personal remarks ; at the same time it is amusing also. I am feeling sorry to see, that such remarks as “ Don’t Bite Newcomers” , have crept into the discussions.

It is my considered opinion that we must maintain certain decorum when making remarks especially in situations where we are dissenting. I request the author to avoid such phrases which are totally against the spirit of Wikipedia Movement.

The issue on hand is very simple.

Mr. Udit Sharma wants to be an “ Admin”. Mr. Mahato has not conveyed his acceptance for this proposal for these reasons:

For getting elected as an Admin in Wikisource, Mr. Sharma does not possess the required credentials, like adding texts, creating index pages, etc. . He has also observed that from Mr. Sharma, excepting for three edits in January 2016, there are no significant contributions. It is said that Mr. Sharma has worked mainly in Wikipedia and not in Wikisource. On the strength of this slender experience Mr. Sharma wants to be an Admin. and Mr. Mahato is not convinced about Sharma’s suitability at this juncture. Prima Facie, , what Mr. Mahato has remarked appears to be pertinent only. If the remarks made by Mahato are not correct, Mr. Sharma could very well defend his stand with supporting facts . Till the observations of Mr. Mahato are proved wrong, they would stand only .

Will not be a better approach for Mr. Sharma to work in Wikisource also with equal Zeal for some more time and gain the required experience for being an Admin ?

To say that because Mr. Mahato has not consented for the candidature of Mr. Sharma, other members should oppose Mr. Mahato's candidature, is unfortunately a childlike argument and may be avoided.--Narayanan V T (सम्भाषणम्) ०७:५७, २० जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)

विरोधं - From your narrative I understand that, you want become an administrator of `Wikisource’.

I feel it is obvious and fundamental that your eagerness should match your testimonials of necessary contributions to the wikisource that can be seen by the world. If that is fulfilled and satisfied, there is no need for `debates’ to install you as administrator.It is better to substantiate than put forth unsubstantiated logic to get promoted as an Administrator.You should be patient enough till all accept you as a merited candidate for Administrative position.

At this juncture I have no option but to oppose your claim to become administrator of Wikisource. But I greet you for future attempts with proven records.--N.R.Bahlika Rao (सम्भाषणम्) ०८:०७, २० जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)

Namste @Sayant Mahato ! I extremely sorry for my silence. But I was very busy in Wikisource, Wikipedia and IEG project work. Line by line I will try to explain my suitability as Mr. Narayanan said. Before that I am clarify that, Please tell me if I have done some unwanted works in wikisource and after my explanation if someone not satisfy, that tell me with reason. Others are done this, so we are opposing you it is not fare.

1. Eligibility & Experience –

From last one year I was looking sa.wikisource. I had seen so much unwanted changes in this project. Like –

• https://sa.wikisource.org/wiki/रामायणम्/युद्धकाण्डम् here so many mistakes are there.
• Most of Pages are not in category.
• Many pages have wrong title. Etc….

I had some text to add in sa.wikisource. But before that I tried to solve this kind of problems. I think I am the person who prepared himself to edit first and after preparation started my work very fast. I am not a new comer and I am a new comer both are true. Because I was studied sa.wikisource work long ago and I was preparing myself to edit sa.wikisource. So my first edit time and my work start time is different.

2. Efficiency –

Please understand that, all the text were in my laptop but before start I wanted to settle problems which I mention above. I am a person who doing every work constructively. I had text but I had been decided to do category and management related work first. After that I will put text into sa.wikisource. You opposed me for text, but before that I made my mind to do management related work only. Now you can see 95% purans pages having category and templates. After that I putted my text into sa.wikipedia. Now you can see efficiency in my contribution.

3 @Narayanan V T, @N.R.Bahlika you both are opposing me. But in your sentences I found so many paths. So I glad to answer you. I had decided many more things to do in sa.wikisource, but after your comment I decided to follow your instructions. I don’t want to prove Sayantji is wrong, but I want to prove my candidature is right.

• If you put a fresh apple with many stales apples, that one fresh apple will be count as stale too. In wikisource there were so much pages, but Hinduism all that categories were there. Most of page hadn’t category and some pages had wrong category. So I decided to solve that problem first and after that put text into it. I studied sa.wikisource long time and made list for categorization. I didn’t know that these two will propose adminship, but I was prepare for adminship. After Uttarayan festival I was willing to propose but when I came from holyday, I saw those propose and I proposed too. That’s it.
• Now please reexamine my work and tell me in one day who can do this much work without any planning or preparation? I worked hard to improve sa.wikisource. After this admin right I will have to do so many work for this project. I had experience so I took hard one decision. I had efficiency so collect text for this project. And eligibility decides here on edits. But for preparation I spent my so much time and thrown myself into this knowledge well. How can I show you?
• Mr. Dave Nehal told me once, हठबुद्धित्वम्, अहङ्कारिता च श्वेतेषु केशेषु (वृद्धावस्थायाम्) अपि न व्यपगच्छति । अहं येन केन प्रकारेण अन्यं तूच्छं सिद्धयामि, अहमेव सर्वं कर्तुं शक्नोमि इत्यादिभावानां युवावस्थायामेव उत प्रौढावस्थायामेव उन्मूलनं न कुर्मः चेत्, वृद्धावस्थायां कष्टं भवति, मरणोत्तरञ्च मुक्तिः तु असम्भवा । I am not an egoistic person. So this admin right is not my ego problem. ("For others it is ego problem" Please don’t took this meaning form this sentence.) I am doing this work for Sanskrit. With this note I respect all opposes. Now I am requesting you all please reexamine my contribution and tell me if I had not put proper text into sa.wikisource. I don’t mind if someone tells me to do something better. It will help me lifelong. Udit Sharma (सम्भाषणम्) २०:४६, २० जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)

प्रबन्धिकाऽऽवेदनम्

अहं शुभा, अधुना विकिस्रोतसः संवर्धनकार्ये निरता अस्मि । संस्कृतविकिस्रोतसः व्यवस्थादृष्ट्या प्रबन्धनकार्यस्य महती आवश्यकता विद्यते इत्यतः पुनर्निवेद्यते मया । I, Shubha working on sa wikisource from last five years. Recently I am contributing more on this project. To moderate Wikisource work I feel there is a great need for an active admin. Hence again I nominate myself as a candidate.

• मम योग्यतापरिशीलनाय द्रष्टुम् अर्हन्ति - शुभा

भवताम् अभिप्रायम् अधः सूचयन्तु इति प्रार्थये । Please do express your opinions. -शुभा (सम्भाषणम्) ११:५१, २३ अक्तूबर २०१६ (UTC)

समर्थनम्/Support

समर्थनम् She is doing great work on wikisource. Based on her contribution to sa_wiki projects, I strongly believe she should become an admin.-Sayant Mahato (सम्भाषणम्) १२:०१, २३ अक्तूबर २०१६ (UTC)

समर्थनम् --Puranastudy (सम्भाषणम्) १५:१४, २४ अक्तूबर २०१६ (UTC)

समर्थनम् शुभामहोदयायाः‌कार्यदक्षतोत्तमा। 🙏

शुभार्यायै शुभं भूयात् विकिस्रोतोऽभिवर्धताम्।
चन्द्रशोभाशुभाशोभे वार्धिविद्याब्धिवृद्धये॥

Vishvas vasuki (सम्भाषणम्) १५:३५, २३ अक्तूबर २०१६ (UTC)

समर्थनम् I Strongly support her candidature for being an admin for sa wikisource activities. Shivaram ac (सम्भाषणम्) ०३:३६, २५ अक्तूबर २०१६ (UTC)

समर्थनम् We need an admin like her. It's is pleasure working with her and her further contribution will help SA Wikisoyrce. Kautuk1 (सम्भाषणम्) ०४:०७, २५ अक्तूबर २०१६ (UTC)

समर्थनम् I worked with Shubha Bhagini. Been helping me to get to comfortable stage to contribute to wikisource. I support to be admin. GANESHDATTA (सम्भाषणम्) ०५:०८, २५ अक्तूबर २०१६ (UTC)

समर्थनम्--Narayanan V T (सम्भाषणम्) ११:४३, २६ अक्तूबर २०१६ (UTC)

समर्थनम्----Premaskanth13 (सम्भाषणम्) ०५:३४, २७ अक्तूबर २०१६ (UTC)

निर्णयः/Decision

• Done from Meta-Wiki. Ajraddatz (सम्भाषणम्) ०५:१९, १६ नवम्बर २०१६ (UTC)

प्रबन्धकाधिकारप्राप्तये आवेदनम् / Adminship application

संस्कृतविकिस्रोतसि संरचनात्मकयोगदानार्थं प्रबन्धकाधिकारः अत्यन्तमुख्यः वर्तते । ततः सायन्त माहातो इत्याह्वया मया प्रबन्धकपदनिमित्तम् आवेद्यते । भवन्तः स्वाभिप्रायान् संसूच्य मम आवेदनस्य समर्थनं कुर्वन्त्विति प्रार्थ्यते।
परिशीलयन्तु मे योगदानानि - सायन्त माहातो

Wikisource adminship is very much helpful to contribute more in a constructive way. Therefore, I’m applying for the adminship. I request you all to share your thoughts and support me.

Please check my Contribution - सायन्त माहातो
--Sayant Mahato (सम्भाषणम्) ०९:२५, १९ जुलाई २०१९ (UTC)

समर्थनम्/Support

1. समर्थनम् सस्कृतविकिसम्बद्धासु सर्वासु अपि परियोजनासु सायन्तस्य योगदानं महत्त्वपूर्णं विद्यते । विशेषतया तन्त्रांशसम्बद्धेषु विषयेषु । अद्यत्वे बहवः संस्कृतविकिस्रोतसि सक्रियरूपेण कार्यं कुर्वन्तः सन्ति । कार्याणि व्यवस्थितरूपेण वेगेन सञ्चालयितुं समर्थानां प्रबन्धकाणां मार्गदर्शनम् अपेक्षितमस्ति । अतः सायन्तः प्रबन्धकत्वेन कार्यं निर्वहतु इति आशासे । Wikisource community needs able and active admins for notable achievements. So I strongly support his candidature for being an admin for sa wikisource activities- शुभा (सम्भाषणम्) १०:०४, १९ जुलाई २०१९ (UTC)
2. समर्थनम् Wikisource community requires knowledgeable,capable and active persons to perform the important task of administration and I strongly support his candidature for being an admin for wikisource activities . Swaminathan sitapathi (सम्भाषणम्) १०:३१, १९ जुलाई २०१९ (UTC)
3. समर्थनम् अहमेच्छामि यत् यदा सायन्तवर्यः प्रबन्धकः भविष्यति, तर्हि शुभासायन्तयोः विचारेषु समितिः भविष्यति। भूतकाले, यदाहं सायन्तवर्यं पृष्टवानस्मि - किं विकिसोर्सः आर्थिकसाहाय्यं अपेक्षति, सः कथयति - आम्। यदा अयमेव प्रश्नं अहं शुभावर्यां अपृच्छम्, सा अकथयत् - न। Puranastudy (सम्भाषणम्) २३:२१, १९ जुलाई २०१९ (UTC) puranastudy
4. समर्थनम् विकिस्रोतसि प्रबन्धकरूपेण कार्यं निर्वोढुं सायन्तस्य सर्वविधसामर्थ्यम् अस्ति। अतः सः प्रबन्धकः भवतु। Sayant Mahato has ability to be an admin in samskrit wikisource. Soorya Hebbar (सम्भाषणम्) ०५:००, २२ जुलाई २०१९ (UTC)
5. समर्थनम् विकिस्रोतसि सायन्तमहोदयस्य योगदानं महत् वर्तते । Sayantji has all the qualities to become an admin of Samskrit Wikisource. Surekha Kamath (सम्भाषणम्) ०५:१९, २२ जुलाई २०१९ (UTC)
6. समर्थनम् सायन्तः प्रबन्धकरूपेण कार्यं निर्वोढुं स्रर्वरुपेण समर्थः अस्ति Sandhyayajur (सम्भाषणम्) १८:५५, ४ अगस्त २०१९ (UTC)